Tuesday, July 10, 2007
Friday, June 22, 2007
Brain Hat
Japanese Researchers Control Toy Train With Their Brains!
Reasearchers at Hitachi have developed an attractive new helmet they call a "brain-machine interface" that allows the wearer not only to look awesomely nerdy but also to control a toy train just by thinking.
Finally! Toy trains will do our bidding! Whatever we think, they will do! It's just like that awesome H.G. Wells story. What was that called again? Oh yeah, "The Man Who Controlled Trains With His Brain (The Toy Ones Not the Big Steam Locomotives...I Mean, Seriously, Control a Steam Locomotive With Your Mind? Even I Think That's a Bit Ridiculous, And I'm H.G. Wells, I Write About All Kinds of Crazy Crap)." I used to love that story.
You're probably wondering, "So how do you make the train go? Do you think forward or go to make the train move and halt or whoa! to make it stop?" Of course not! It's so much easier than that. You either do simple calculations in your head -- 4x2=8, 8x8=64 and like that -- and the train moves forward. When you stop doing them, the train stops! You can also sing a song to make the train go. You could even combine the two and sing a song about calculations to make it go. Might I recommend "Hey Little Twelve Toes" or "Three Is a Magic Number" from Schoolhouse Rock?
My second most favorite part about this story is how the author of the article first mentions that this technology could be used to control TVs, turning them on and off or changing the channels and whatnot. You know, instead of burning all of those additional calories using that heavy and cumbersome TV remote. Only after mentioning that use does the author add how this technology could assist disabled people. Because we should keep our priorities straight people. Let's help the laziest TV watchers first, and then worry about helping those who are actually disabled (or "permanently lazy," as I like to say).

But my most favorite part of this story is how much the "brainhat," as I like to call it, looks like the crazy hi-tech colander Egon Spengler (Harold Ramis) puts on Louis Tully's (Rick Moranis) head in the original Ghostbusters. Oh yeah, many Zuuls knew what it was like to be roasted in the depths of the Slor that day, I can tell you!
Thursday, June 14, 2007
It's Raining Men!
I only wish I was making this up. But it's true. In 1994 -- one year after President Bill Clinton announced the "don't ask, don't tell" policy regarding gays in the military -- the Air Force's Wright Laboratory in Dayton, Ohio, requested $7.5 million to develop a "gay bomb." Of course, the Department of Defense claims that the idea was "quickly dismissed." But Hammond doesn't really believe that.

"The truth of the matter is it would have never come to my attention if it was dismissed at the time it was proposed," Hammond said. "In fact, the Pentagon has used it repeatedly and subsequently in an effort to promote non-lethal weapons, and in fact they submitted it to the highest scientific review body in the country for them to consider."
My question, then, is about the tipping point. What happened in 1994 to finally push the military to believe in the possibility and (even better) the efficacy of a "gay bomb"? Certainly there was some combination of events, a perfect storm of gayness that made this possible. As it turns out, this is absolutely the case.
The pump was primed, as it were, by 1993, a year in which the World Wide Web (where gay images are readily available) was born, in which Janet Reno became the first female US Attorney General (a job everyone knows belongs to a man, not a mannish woman), and in which President Clinton signed the Brady Bill (if gun ownership = manliness, then it follows that gun control = gay).
Then, in January of '94, Lorena Bobbitt was found not guilty (by reason of insanity) of cutting her husband's penis off and throwing it into an empty lot. This led, as these cases invariably do, to John Bobbitt and his re-attached member starring in a porn movie titled Frankenpenis. While the movie was straight porn, it was definitely marketed to entice hetero men to ogle another man's Johnson. And intentional schlong-ogling = gay.
1994 was also the year that future celebrity boxer Tonya Harding ordered the brutal clubbing of Nancy Kerrigan's knee. This event would, in retrospect, seem a whole lot less gay if the "sport" involved wasn't figure skating, the third most gay sport in the world (behind ballroom dancing and NASCAR). It is also the year that Shannon Faulkner became the first female cadet to attend the all-male school The Citadel. Faulkner would soon drop out, leaving the men of The Citadel lady-less once again. (And what happens at The Citadel stays at The Citadel!)
At the box office, Disney's The Lion King was tops. It should be noted that The Lion King was not only a musical, but a musical co-written by Elton John, a performer known for being both gay and flamboyant! Other big box office movies of 1994 that featured gay (or sexually ambiguous) undertones or themes include Ed Wood, It's Pat!, Four Weddings and a Funeral, Interview With a Vampire and, of course, The Flintstones.
The Channel Tunnel finally opened in 1994, connecting France (totally gay) and England (72% bi-curious). And President Clinton signed the Assault Weapons Ban, a law only a total pussy could get behind.
Other possible contributing factors include the deaths of former president Richard "Tricky Dick" Nixon, Charles Bukowski (a poet) and comedian John Candy (not gay but Canadian); the multiple Grammy wins for "I Will Always Love You", the theme from The Bodyguard; and the multiple Emmy wins for Frasier, the hilarious TV show about two gay brothers who are in love with each other and fight with their gay dad. Also, the Tonys were handed out yet again in 1994.
So maybe it was inevitable that a homophobic entity such as the Pentagon would try to build a "gay bomb," but I feel it's obvious from looking at the year in question that events beyond anyone's control forced the gay bomb into existence.
Oh, did I say it existed already? My mistake. Of course it doesn't exist. And likewise, the government probably stopped trying to develop it. Shhh. Go back to sleep. But don't come crying to me when you wake up gay.
Monday, June 4, 2007
Monday, May 28, 2007
Worst Case Scenarios: China Edition
To death. This is China we're talking about. They're not what you'd call real big on the human rights, so death it is.
One of the products Zheng Xiaoyu allowed through was a toothpaste, found on Central American and Caribbean store shelves, called Mr. Cool.
Along with its cavity-fighting fluoride, Mr. Cool also has a special ingredient: diethylene glycol, an industrial solvent used a lot in antifreeze. The New York Times has referred to it as a "syrupy poison." Well, I guess that's bad on Zheng for allowing diethylene glycol to be packaged and sold as ordinary glycerine. You see, it's cheaper than glycerine and sweeter than glycerine. So you could see how it makes fiscal sense...except for the "more poisonous than glycerine" part. This on the heels of the melamine-tainted pet food business.
Not what you'd call a banner year for Zheng. Even so, a death sentence? Wow, China, that's hard-core.
Tuesday, May 22, 2007
Another World Series
Friday, May 4, 2007
Get Professional Help!
Notice the exclamation points. Notice how thoroughly the note is taped to the stall. If you look closely, you can see that it is fully covered in wide, clear packing tape, as if laminated to the stainless steel of the stall door. While I cannot in good conscience take the side of the toilet stuffer, I find it hard to get fully behind the person who wrote the note either. He seems to have a completely different set of compulsions. Not that I'm convinced that either of the participants in this little dance are actually mentally ill, but they just don't seem like they'd be cool to hang out with.
One should also keep in mind some of the weird characters at this particular job. Like the executive assistant on the fourth floor who puts paper towels on her hands to touch almost anything. This same executive assistant also cleaned up a co-worker's messy desk while the messy co-worker was out of town. The messy desk in question was around the corner and completely out of sight. It's not like she had to stare at it. It's more like she could hear the mess calling to her from down the hall and around the corner and couldn't resist going to clean it up.
I feel I should also pass on a story a female co-worker, let's call her Vera, told me. Vera walked into the women's bathroom in this same building and saw that some woman had brought her tray of food straight from the commissary and left it sitting on the counter by the sinks. She was stunned and stared at the tray for a moment until the owner of the tray came out of her stall and said, jovially, "I see you staring at my food! You can't have any." To which Vera replied, "I don't want any of your bathroom food."
Finally, I must add that I once saw a male co-worker (in the unpleasant second floor bathroom) standing at the stall, urinating. While eating an apple.
Mmmm, bathroom apples! Delicious!
